<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Oomska</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oomska.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oomska.co.uk</link>
	<description>an online arts &#38; pop culture magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:57:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Homeland: Smart New Show, Same Old Stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.oomska.co.uk/homeland-smart-new-show-same-old-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oomska.co.uk/homeland-smart-new-show-same-old-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony McKiver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oomska.co.uk/?p=4182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[‘Homeland’ has been critically praised for its intelligence, but its reliance on weary stereotypes often makes it feel like ‘24’ in drag. Writing in The Guardian, Rebecca Nicholson has praised ‘Homeland’, a new Showtime TV series, as “a grownup thriller” that “feels like it’s addressing the moment.” The very fact, however, that the series presents [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oomska.co.uk/homeland-smart-new-show-same-old-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking Bad: How Good TV Goes Bad</title>
		<link>http://www.oomska.co.uk/breaking-bad-how-good-tv-goes-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oomska.co.uk/breaking-bad-how-good-tv-goes-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony McKiver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oomska.co.uk/?p=4059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Breaking Bad&#8217; is ostensibly the story of how a good, indeed gifted, man goes bad. It is also, however, a cautionary tale about the way in which good TV goes bad. In its first two seasons, &#8216;Breaking Bad&#8217; was a gripping, blackly comic tale that skilfully led viewers down an excruciatingly entertaining story path in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oomska.co.uk/breaking-bad-how-good-tv-goes-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Across Some Earthly Firmament &#8211; David Copperfield</title>
		<link>http://www.oomska.co.uk/across-some-earthly-firmament-david-copperfield/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oomska.co.uk/across-some-earthly-firmament-david-copperfield/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Carvill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Across Some Earthly Firmament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Dickens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oomska.co.uk/?p=4160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, Oomska wishes a very happy 200th birthday to Charles Dickens. Here we present a favourite passage, from a favourite chapter, from a book that&#8217;s a favourite of ours, and of the inimitable Mr Dickens himself: none other than &#8216;The Personal History of David Copperfield&#8217;. &#8220;I went on, by passing the wine faster and faster [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oomska.co.uk/across-some-earthly-firmament-david-copperfield/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Stuff That Dreams Are Made Of</title>
		<link>http://www.oomska.co.uk/the-stuff-that-dreams-are-made-of/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oomska.co.uk/the-stuff-that-dreams-are-made-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Carvill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humphrey Bogart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oomska.co.uk/?p=3833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A plea, and a proposal, for a worthwhile book on the films of Humphrey Bogart. Tom Polhous: &#8220;It&#8217;s heavy. What is it?&#8221; Sam Spade: &#8220;The, uh, stuff that dreams are made of.&#8221; - The Maltese Falcon, 1941 Whatever the secret ingredient was that fuelled the Hollywood dream factory, Humphrey Bogart had it, in spades. Like [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oomska.co.uk/the-stuff-that-dreams-are-made-of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Future of Photography Q&amp;A No.11 – Jeff Curto</title>
		<link>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-11-jeff-curto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-11-jeff-curto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Carvill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oomska.co.uk/?p=4042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oomska&#8217;s &#8216;Future of Photography&#8217; Series continues&#8230; We presented our interviewees with a set list of questions, and left the matter of in what format and at what length they should answer entirely up to them. Here are Jeff Curto&#8217;s responses. 1. How and when did you first become interested in photography? What was the trigger [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-11-jeff-curto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Future of Photography Q&amp;A No.10 – Peter Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-10-peter-marshall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-10-peter-marshall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Carvill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Marshall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oomska.co.uk/?p=4044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oomska&#8217;s &#8216;Future of Photography&#8217; Series continues&#8230; We presented our interviewees with a set list of questions, and left the matter of in what format and at what length they should answer entirely up to them. Here are Peter marshall&#8217;s responses. 1. How and when did you first become interested in photography? What was the trigger [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-10-peter-marshall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Future of Photography Q&amp;A No.9 – Nick Turpin</title>
		<link>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-9-nick-turpin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-9-nick-turpin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Carvill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oomska.co.uk/?p=4011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oomska&#8217;s &#8216;Future of Photography&#8217; Series continues&#8230; We presented our interviewees with a set list of questions, and left the matter of in what format and at what length they should answer entirely up to them. Here are Nick Turpin&#8217;s responses. 1. How and when did you first become interested in photography? What was the trigger [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-9-nick-turpin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Future of Photography Q&amp;A No.8 – Emma Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-8-emma-jay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-8-emma-jay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Carvill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oomska.co.uk/?p=4004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oomska&#8217;s &#8216;Future of Photography&#8217; Series continues&#8230; We presented our interviewees with a set list of questions, and left the matter of in what format and at what length they should answer entirely up to them. Here are Emma Jay&#8217;s responses. 1. How and when did you first become interested in photography? What was the trigger [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-8-emma-jay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Future of Photography Q&amp;A No.7 – Tamara Bogolasky</title>
		<link>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-7-tamara-bogolasky/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-7-tamara-bogolasky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Carvill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oomska.co.uk/?p=3994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oomska&#8217;s &#8216;Future of Photography&#8217; Series continues&#8230; We presented our interviewees with a set list of questions, and left the matter of in what format and at what length they should answer entirely up to them. Here are Tamara Bogolasky&#8217;s responses. 1. How and when did you first become interested in photography? What was the trigger [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-7-tamara-bogolasky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Future of Photography Q&amp;A No.6 – Carlein van der Beek</title>
		<link>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-6-carlein-van-der-beek/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-6-carlein-van-der-beek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Carvill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oomska.co.uk/?p=3937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oomska&#8217;s &#8216;Future of Photography&#8217; Series continues&#8230; We presented our interviewees with a set list of questions, and left the matter of in what format and at what length they should answer entirely up to them. Here are Carlein van der Beek&#8217;s responses. 1. How and when did you first become interested in photography? What was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oomska.co.uk/future-of-photography-qa-no-6-carlein-van-der-beek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

