Future of Photography Q&A No.6 – Carlein van der Beek

Oomska’s ‘Future of Photography’ Series continues…

We presented our interviewees with a set list of questions, and left the matter of in what format and at what length they should answer entirely up to them. Here are Carlein van der Beek’s responses.

1. How and when did you first become interested in photography? What was the trigger which led you to take a serious interest? How different would that trigger be now, with all the changes – technological and otherwise – in photography during the intervening years?

My background is in painting, abstracts, and mixed media. At the art academy where I studied, I was also able to take photography classes. I loved it. It was analogue, of course: black and white, developing your own film, working in the dark room. I have always been purely visual and photography gave me the chance to make images when it was not possible to paint.

The trigger wouldn’t be any different now. As I don’t have space to paint right now, photography is the only way of expressing myself at the moment.

2. Photography is often described as a mixture of art and science. It’s also a medium. How has digital technology altered the way these elements combine to produce what we think of as ‘photography’? Has technology altered that balance?

I switched to digital only 10 years ago. Though I loved working in analogue, I wouldn’t want to go back anymore, or only for a special project. To me, Photoshopping or apping, is – in a way – a kind of chemistry, science as well.

But instead of working with your hands, you have to “see” the process in your head. It did change my way of taking pictures. As my background is mixed media pieces, I am used to “building” images. I did so with painting and now I am able to do so with photography as well. In a way I am painting with photos. So to me digital together with the Photoshopping and apping is a gift that enables me to work the way I want.

Continue reading

Future of Photography Q&A No.5 – Philip Greenspun

Oomska’s ‘Future of Photography’ Series continues…

We presented our interviewees with a set list of questions, and left the matter of in what format and at what length they should answer entirely up to them. Here are Philip Greenspun’s responses.

1. How and when did you first become interested in photography? What was the trigger which led you to take a serious interest? How different would that trigger be now, with all the changes – technological and otherwise – in photography during the intervening years?

My mother let me use a Kodak Brownie camera starting around 1970. I started out documenting boring family scenes. Probably with digital I would have started much earlier and experimented a lot more since the cost of film and processing was not affordable to me as a child.

2. Photography is often described as a mixture of art and science. It’s also a medium. How has digital technology altered the way these elements combine to produce what we think of as ‘photography’? Has technology altered that balance?

There should be a lot more great young photographers than ever before, since photography is now almost a free activity whereas before just a handful of photos would have used up a child’s allowance.

Continue reading

Future of Photography Q&A No.4 – Derek Ridgers

Oomska’s ‘Future of Photography’ Series continues…

We presented our interviewees with a set list of questions, and left the matter of in what format and at what length they should answer entirely up to them. Here are Derek Ridgers’s responses.

The question I most get asked, more than any other, and which fits this Q&A well enough is: “How can I get started as a photographer?”

In the digital age this question is probably more pertinent than it’s ever been because there is so much less printed media around and so many more photographers.

My answer would be: know and research well your market and then look for gaps which aren’t currently being addressed.  Obviously there may be good reasons why those gaps aren’t being covered but there will always be opportunities for people who can see things that other people don’t see.  If you want to shoot ‘me too’ type fashion or glamour or kids or nature, fine.  But just don’t expect to get a career out of it.

In other words, don’t follow the crowd, look for something new which you can make 100% your own.  And if it’s new enough and interesting enough, people will beat a path to your door.

Continue reading

Across Some Earthly Firmament – ‘Against the Day’

Today, Oomska begins an occasional literary series, ‘Across Some Earthly Firmament’, fired by an ambition which vaults no higher than merely sharing some arbitrarily selected prose passages which we feel are worth arbitrarily selecting.

We start with – and pinch the name for this series from – a short but pungent dollop of genius from Oomska’s favourite living author, the incomparable Thomas Pynchon. This passage, from Pynchon’s colossal 2006 novel, ‘Against the Day’, employs Pynchon’s gentle humour, rolling rhythms, and poetic elegance, to document the moment when the ‘Chums of Chance’, a group of dime-store ‘boy’s own’ story adventurers come to life, navigate their hot-air balloon down towards the Chicago World’s Fair of 1893. This will be the boys’ first encounter with a pioneering photographer who will come to play a key role in their story, just as photography itself will provide a central theme for Pynchon’s omni-faceted novel. Thus we felt this passage was a doubly apt way to begin the series, as this week saw both the launch of Oomska’s ‘Future of Photography’ Q&A feature, plus the sad news that Kodak – a name synonymous with photography for much of the 20th Century – have declared bankruptcy.

“Across the herbaceous nap below, in the declining light, among the brighter star-shapes of exploded ballast-bags, running heedless, as across some earthly firmament, sped a stout gentleman in a Norfolk jacket and plus-fours, clutching a straw “skimmer” to the back of his head with one hand while with the other keeping balanced upon his shoulder a photographic camera and tripod. Close behind him came the female companion Blundell had remarked, carrying a bundle of ladies’ apparel, though clad at the moment in little beyond a floral diadem of some sort, charmingly askew among masses of fair hair. The duo appeared to be making for a nearby patch of woods, now and then casting apprehensive looks upward at the enormous gasbag of the descending Inconvenience, quite as if it were some giant eyeball, perhaps that of Society itself, ever scrutinizing from above, in a spirit of constructive censure. By the time Lindsay could remove the optical instrument from the moist hands of Miles Blundell, and induce the consequently disgruntled youth to throw out grapnels and assist Darby in securing the great airship to “Mother Earth,” the indecorous couple had vanished among the foliage, as presently would this sector of the Republic into the falling darkness.”

- Thomas Pynchon, ‘Against the Day’

Future of Photography Q&A No.3 – Steve Gullick

Oomska’s ‘Future of Photography’ Series continues…

We presented our interviewees with a set list of questions, and left the matter of in what format and at what length they should answer entirely up to them. Here are Steve Gullick’s responses.

OH SHIT!… This is heavy (I don’t generally use such terminology) . I also don’t like to intellectualize photography… That said, it’s conceivable that my only future within the industry could be to intellectualize the art form in the form of teaching the subject to young people – many of whom are never likely to earn a penny as photographers…. Every photo enthusiast that takes a picture for commercial use without being paid devalues it as a means of making a living… It’s nice that digital has democratized photography & has allowed anybody to vent their creative spleen with no need to know anything about the process but for those of us that have the skills & experience, the influx of keen amateurs is damaging… Everything moves on I suppose, how many blacksmiths do you know?

Continue reading